What strange phenomenon does not allow us to believe that there is a
formula to solve the mistakes of the economy that we are suffering today?
only we had listened to the well intended but conservative people, the
sun will be still spinning around the earth once a day. In this matter,
the solution to the enigma also exists.
The wage is
only paying what the work is managing to achieve and not what is being
produced in the process.
The wage is
what the worker needs, but if this is added with regards to the profits
of the project, it becomes fair.
there are no profits, the wage is fair. On the contrary, when there are
profits, in the project, the salary earner must be paid effectively for
what he has done and not for what he exactly need, that is what solves
our project: the wage will still be unfair because it will continue to
be what the worker needs.
wage will never be the reward of the effort and creativity of the worker.
The work that it is not only consumed time. It is much more than that;
it is merit to increase the production and the sales and to reduce
mentality, rationality and electivity, things that are more valuable
than the physical consumed work. There will be Assignments Plus with the
money the boss tax as the Profits Tax. To resolve the problem, the
Profits tax will not have to be for the State. It must be award to the
own and outside personnel of each project, then the payment will be
should be prorated. Use our imagination to glimpse how the profitability
of our projects will increase when that money, which forms part of the
profits, (and that has already been demonstrated to be the surpluses of
the employee’s work) stop being administrated by the State and start to
be administrated individually by the employees. Let’s imagine the effect
of that Assignments Plus. The capital and the work have relative
potentialities easily calculable.
They are in the same relation between their costs: interest,
amortizations, insurance and inherent taxes, are the costs of the
immobilized capital. At the same time the remuneration is the cost of
important mistake is the doctrinaire believes, which assert that the
surplus is social. That is very pernicious, because it brings to the
worst injustices. This mistake is the one that has left us in this swamp
of poverty with all its consequences. The surplus that we generate
belongs to us. This is the real labour injustice. The ridicule
aberration of charging Profits Tax to the employees deserves another
How is the human promoted? Is it about creating dependence through gifts
or about favouring conditions for the people to recover their dignity
and their autonomy? Is it about delivering money and goods or about
promoting resources for the people to supply themselves? Is it about the
poverty as a tool to obtain something in exchange or is it about working
to include the one that have capacities to work into the society?
The client hood continues to exist in the country and it is more
interest in what is receiving in exchange that in what is delivering. It
is not only about the distortion of waiting something in exchange for
giving as a present what has been bought with his own money (because our
representatives are not developing other than our resources). It is
about the incredible distortion through which the poverty becomes a
source of resources for the politics, instead of being the politics a
source of resources – not only monetary- assigned to eradicate the
poverty. It is true that there are examples of public social investment
where the development is promoted, in this case the investment is made
electoral to perpetuate certain political management to which,
internally, and poverty is convenient.
Can politics be different without a different conception of the human?
As well as the indiscriminate genetic could create a way of pos-humanity
and a chain to the permanent exclusion. Because with that the person is
considered in terms of price and not of values, and men are treated as a
means and not as an aim. And simultaneously poverty is also taken, not
only as a means to obtain vote, but also as an aim, where it is
phenomenon is impeding us to fight for those real truths that benefit
the enterprising as much as the salary-earners? Which strange phenomenon
takes us irreversibly to the economic futility of the humanity?